{"id":2071,"date":"2014-06-03T00:57:29","date_gmt":"2014-06-02T14:57:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/?p=2071"},"modified":"2014-06-03T00:57:29","modified_gmt":"2014-06-02T14:57:29","slug":"doggett-backs-in-professor-halton","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/?p=2071","title":{"rendered":"Doggett backs in Professor Halton"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In the context of recent experiences, this analysis does not stand up:<\/p>\n<p><strong>Blaming a public servant \u2013 even one as senior and reputedly influential as Professor Halton \u2013 for a bad Government decision not only lets Minister Peter Dutton off the hook on this issue, it undermines the fundamental accountability of the Government.\u00a0 Both critics and supporters of the Government and its 2014\/15 Budget initiatives should focus on ensuring Ministers are fully answerable to the community for their decisions and not look to public servants as scapegoats.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Also annoying to see Terry continuing to dig a hole:<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #333333;\">Former Liberal adviser Terry Barnes took to Twitter over the weekend to publicly criticise Department of Health Secretary Professor Jane Halton for her role in the Government\u2019s GP co-payment Budget initiative.\u00a0 Among his comments were \u201cJane Halton was chief designer of the GP co-pay package. Send her to Geneva, not Finance\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>http:\/\/blogs.crikey.com.au\/croakey\/2014\/06\/02\/senate-estimates-what-they-reveal-about-federal-budget-201415\/<\/p>\n<div id=\"post-head-19594\" class=\"post-head\" style=\"color: #333333;\">\n<h2 class=\"entry-title\">Senate Estimates \u2013 what they reveal about Federal Budget 2014\/15<\/h2>\n<div class=\"entry-meta\"><span class=\"entry-meta author vcard\"><a class=\"url fn n\" style=\"color: #333333;\" title=\"\" href=\"http:\/\/blogs.crikey.com.au\/croakey\/author\/jdoggett\/\">JENNIFER DOGGETT<\/a><\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"meta-sep\">|<\/span>\u00a0<span class=\"date\">JUN 02, 2014 4:20PM <\/span><span class=\"meta-sep\">|<\/span>\u00a0<a class=\"email\" style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #669900;\" title=\"Email this article\" href=\"mailto:?subject=Check%20out%20%22Senate%20Estimates%20%E2%80%93%20what%20they%20reveal%20about%20Federal%20Budget%202014%2F15%22%20on%20Crikey&amp;body=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.crikey.com.au%2Fcroakey%2F2014%2F06%2F02%2Fsenate-estimates-what-they-reveal-about-federal-budget-201415%2F\" rel=\"nofollow\">EMAIL<\/a>\u00a0<span class=\"meta-sep\">|<\/span>\u00a0<a class=\"print\" style=\"font-weight: bold; color: #669900;\" title=\"Print this article\" rel=\"nofollow\">PRINT<\/a><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-meta\"><\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-meta\">The\u00a0Budget sittings of Senate Estimates are on again this week with senior bureaucrats filing into the various committee rooms of the Senate to be grilled by Opposition and minor party Senators, desperate to find some additional details, figures, omissions or politically sensitive procedural issues in order maintain the Budget rage for as long as possible.<\/div>\n<div class=\"entry-meta\"><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<div id=\"post-19594\" class=\"hentry p post publish author-jennifer-doggett category-federal-budget-2014-15 category-general-practice category-health-and-medical-research category-health-financing-and-costs untagged y2014 m06 d03 h02 alt clearfix\" style=\"color: #333333;\">\n<div id=\"post-content\">\n<p>Estimates are an important part of Government accountability and transparency processes and can often reveal some key details of funding measures which may not have been disclosed in the official Budget papers or, through some political \u2018oversight\u2019, left out of the Budget night communications.<\/p>\n<p>For example, last week Senator Penny Wong relentless pursued a line of inquiry on the cuts to Indigenous health services \u2013 revealing that despite the significantly poorer status of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Australians, services to them were being cut by over half a billion dollars with the future a broad range of health, social welfare and education programmes still in budgetary limbo.<\/p>\n<p>Senator Rachel Siewert has also been active in Estimates on this issue sending out a number of Tweets, including the following:<\/p>\n<p>OMG Govt health ppl responsible for Aboriginal Medical Services haven\u2019t modelled impact of $7 GP co-payment on those services<\/p>\n<p>Govt cutting $165.8m from Aboriginal health to put in Health Research Future Fund \u2013 as if the health problems aren\u2019t urgent now<br \/>\n<strong>\u00a0<\/strong><br \/>\nSorry apparently these aren\u2019t cuts to Aboriginal health programmes they are pauses<\/p>\n<p>Due to its potential for ferretting out nuggets of media-friendly and politically damaging information, the Estimates process has become a much more intense and partisan process than perhaps it was ever intended to be.\u00a0 With politicians interrogating public servants for their own political ends and using the opportunity for some grandstanding of their own, the pressure on bureaucrats to maintain their a-political positions is intense. Surely it can\u2019t be easy for a senior public servant, no doubt impacted themselves by Government cuts to the bureaucracy and worried about their own job security, to have to explain Government policies and funding cuts they often had little influence over and in many cases don\u2019t agree with?<\/p>\n<p>Despite the potential for \u2018free and fearless advice\u2019 to be overshadowed by political machinations, it\u2019s important not to blur the lines between the political and bureaucratic processes when looking at the Senate Estimates process. \u00a0<strong>Former Liberal adviser Terry Barnes took to Twitter over the weekend to publicly criticise Department of Health Secretary Professor Jane Halton for her role in the Government\u2019s GP co-payment Budget initiative.\u00a0 Among his comments were \u201cJane Halton was chief designer of the GP co-pay package. Send her to Geneva, not Finance\u2019.<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>I am not privy to the communications between the Department and the Minister\u2019s Office on the co-payment issue and I am not a fan of this fundamentally flawed policy. \u00a0However,\u00a0regardless of the advice Professor Halton and her Department provided to the Minister, she cannot be held in any way responsible for the Government\u2019s policy decisions on this, or any other, issue.\u00a0 As an unelected public servant, her role is to give advice and it is the role of the Government to then act on this advice, if it so wishes. Fundamental to our Westminster system of Government is the accountability of Ministers for their decisions and the ability of the public to remove them from office via an election if these decisions prove unpopular. This accountability exists regardless of the quality of the advice they receive on the issue (although it has to be said there were plenty of people around who could have pointed out the problems with the co-payment policy).<\/p>\n<p><strong>Blaming a public servant \u2013 even one as senior and reputedly influential as Professor Halton \u2013 for a bad Government decision not only lets Minister Peter Dutton off the hook on this issue, it undermines the fundamental accountability of the Government.\u00a0 Both critics and supporters of the Government and its 2014\/15 Budget initiatives should focus on ensuring Ministers are fully answerable to the community for their decisions and not look to public servants as scapegoats.<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In the context of recent experiences, this analysis does not stand up: Blaming a public servant \u2013 even one as senior and reputedly influential as Professor Halton \u2013 for a bad Government decision not only lets Minister Peter Dutton off the hook on this issue, it undermines the fundamental accountability of the Government.\u00a0 Both critics &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/?p=2071\" class=\"more-link\">Continue reading <span class=\"screen-reader-text\">Doggett backs in Professor Halton<\/span> <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[9,22,6],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-2071","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-healthcare","category-policy","category-politics"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=2071"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2072,"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2071\/revisions\/2072"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=2071"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=2071"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/blog.panicola.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=2071"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}