Category Archives: quantified self

IFTTT = If This Then That (awesome)

Automated Life Logging. Go Figure.

http://www.engadget.com/2014/05/20/ifttt-fitbit-channel/

If you’re sporting one of Fitbit’s activity trackers, you can now automate tasks and reminders with the help of IFTTT (If This Then That). The recipe-based software announced a dedicated channel for the sporty gadgets today, handling duties based on goals, activity, sleep, weight and more. For example, you can now log a weigh-in via text message or automatically beam sleep stats to a Google Spreadsheet each morning. Of course, those are just a couple of the possibilities, and users can construct their own formulas as well. Those who prefer Jawbone’s wearables have already been privy to the automated life logging, with other wrist-worn devices like the Pebble smartwatch supported too.

Healthways Australia Workshop with NSWHealth

Healthways Presentation (PDF): 20140508_Healthways_Workplace_Health_Workshop

NSWHealth Presentation (PDF):GetHealthyAtWork_Presentation_Prof.Rissel

Dear all,

Thank you to all of you who attended the Healthier Workplace Workshop on Thursday 8th May. We hope you found the event both interesting and informative.

Following a number of requests, the speaker presentations are now available online:

http://www.healthwaysaustralia.com.au/PPT_Presentations/GetHealthyAtWork_Presentation_Prof.Rissel.pdf

http://www.healthwaysaustralia.com.au/PPT_Presentations/20140508_Healthways_Workplace_Health_Workshop.pdf

We welcome your feedback on this event and any future topics you would like to see covered. If you would like more information of the wellbeing programs run by Healthways please don’t hesitate to contact a member of the team on 02 8264 4800  or visit the Healthways website: www.healthwaustralia.com.au .

We look forward to seeing you at one of our future events.

Kind regards

Sara Stevenson

Marketing and Business Development Specialist

Healthways Australia

Level 2, 1 Julius Ave

North Ryde, NSW, 2113

Tel: 02 8264 4800

Mob: 0427 461 035

Sara.Stevenson@healthways.com

http://www.healthwaysaustralia.com.au

 

 

Creating a healthier world one person at a time

 

PACT – tool to motivate exercise

Larger fines fund smaller rewards. Perfect!

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/money-a-motivator-in-exercise-app

Money a motivator in exercise app

6th May 2014

Dr Rosemary Atkinson   all articles by this author

PACT is a good tool to recommend to the techno-savvy patient needing motivation to get out and moving.

Created by a pair of Harvard students, it purports to help 92% of users live a healthier life by using money as a motivator.

Pact requires users to set the number of exercise sessions they will complete in the coming week. They then agree to a fine ($5–50) for every session they miss. Those who meet their goals are rewarded by receiving money paid by those who fail (25–60 cents per workout).

In order to verify that the exercise is being done, visits are logged at a gym via GPS check through the app, or for physical activity outside of a gym by measuring activity with a ‘motion tracker’, or in conjunction with partner apps such as Run-Keeper, Fitbit, Jawbone Up, MapMyRun or MyFitnessPal.

Users can access the number of workouts completed and money earned via the profile page. The settings screen allows you to set and modify your workouts for the next week, withdraw rewards and schedule a break.

Pact uses a carrot and stick approach to promote positive behaviour change and although the monetary reward is small, it may be enough to provide motivation for at least a proportion of patients.

AppPact

CostFree 

CompatibilityiPhone, iPod touch, iPad

RequirementsiOS 6.0 or later

Registration requiredYes 

The verdict: 3 stars

1=optional 2=useful 3=recommended 4=must have

iTuneshttps://itunes.apple.com/au/app/pact-earn-cash-for-living/id456068701?mt=8

Extremely cool $150 smartphone spectrometer

 

http://gigaom.com/2014/04/29/consumer-physics-150-smartphone-spectrometer-can-tell-the-number-of-calories-in-your-food/

https://www.kickstarter.com/projects/903107259/scio-your-sixth-sense-a-pocket-molecular-sensor-fo

Consumer Physics’ $150 smartphone spectrometer can tell the number of calories in your food

SCiO-In-Hand---900px

SUMMARY:The SCiO is a handheld molecular analyzer, developed by Consumer Physics, which pairs with a smartphone through Bluetooth LE. The Kickstarter launched Tuesday morning and a fully operational SCiO starts at $149.

Would you like to be able to look up the calorie content of the specific apple you’re eating? You could take it to a lab and run it through a spectrometer, but accurate spectrometers are huge, expensive machines that are often only owned by institutions and require training to use. A new startup, however, wants to make iteasy as running an app and pairing a bluetooth dongle.

SCiO

The SCiO is a handheld device that pairs with a smartphone through Bluetooth LE being developed by Consumer Physics, an Israel-based startup funded by Kholsa Ventures. It’s based on near-infrared spectroscopy, which means it reflects light onto an object, then collects and analyzes the light reflected back. The Kickstarter launched Tuesday morning with several funding levels: a fully operational SCiO starts at $149, but Kickstarter backers pledging over $300 will receive two years of guaranteed app upgrades.

While scientists and researchers use near-infrared spectroscopy on a regular basis, there are lots of consumers that would love to know more about the chemical composition of the world around them, whether it’s identifying the pills left in the back of the medicine cabinet or figuring out whether the fruit at the farmer’s market is ripe. Consumer Physics will offer both Android and iPhone apps, and also hopes to develop a platform upon which third parties can build their own apps.

Using the SCiO is simple: shine its blue light onto an object you want to analyze. In a few seconds, the associated smartphone app will take the spectrometer reading, send it to SCiO servers, analyze it and compare it to a database of known spectral signatures, and display the information in an easy-to-understand manner. In turn, the readings provided by users will make the spectral signature database more complete.

Consumer Physics has developed three different applications for identifying food, medicines, and plants. During a short demo, I saw the module return the percentage of fat and number of calories per 100 grams of cheese. The SCiO was also able to identify a number of different over-the-counter drugs and could distinguish between a Tylenol and a Tylenol PM. I did not see the plant application, but eventually, it should be able to measure leaf hydration and soil hydration and provide hydroponic solution analysis.

While the SCiO prototype is about the size of a large keyring, the actual module is much smaller. It’s closer to the size of a smartphone camera module, and could one day be included in a variety of forms, including wearables. Developer kits available through the Kickstarter for $200 offer bare-bones SCiO modules and come with CAD designs for 3D printers.

Although Consumer Physics, in addition to developing the hardware, is also populating the first databases and apps that work with the SCiO, hopefully other companies will build their own apps, using the developer kit available from Kickstarter. Personally, I’d love to see apps that would identify if a drink has been spiked with drugs. However, you might have to pay, especially for specific professional use-cases. Spectography is often used to identify gems, and CEO Dror Oren adds, “If someone wants to offer an application for diamonds that costs $1,000, that’s the kind of platform we want to build.”

Other companies working in the portable spectrometer space have also used the technology to track calories eaten and nutritional intake through a user’s sweat.

The first SCiO prototypes will ship in October and the Kickstarter is live now.

Digital Therapeutics – Omada Health

The world is finally entering a new era of effective, scalable, and life-saving change, all delivered through the other end of an internet connection. For three out of four of us, that change can’t come soon enough.

http://www.forbes.com/sites/sciencebiz/2014/04/17/what-if-doctors-could-finally-prescribe-behavior-change/

BUSINESS 4/17/2014 @ 5:31PM |3,232 views

What If Doctors Could Finally Prescribe Behavior Change?

Three out of four Americans will die of a disease that could be avoided—if only they could re-route their unhealthy habits. A new category of medicine, digital therapeutics, wants to change the course of these conditions — and of history.

Doctors have known for decades that, in order to prevent disease or its complications, they were going to have to get into people’s living rooms and convince them to change everyday behaviors that would very likely kill them. To that end, back in the early ’90s, health institutions started trying to intervene largely via the cutting-edge technology that existed at the time: phone calls. At-risk populations were dialed up and encouraged to take steps that could ward off heart disease, diabetes complications, lung cancer and other avoidable conditions that cause 75% of Americans to die prematurely.

As you can imagine, these calls largely flopped. A phone interaction led by a stranger who interrupts your dinner hour, no matter how well-intentioned, felt like more like an intrusion than meaningful
support.

The more we discover about behavioral science, the more naïve those calls seem in retrospect. Whether it’s for weight loss, smoking cessation, diabetes, or otherwise, the best research shows that meaningful behavior change outcomes require not just guidance from a trusted health professional, but also positive social support, easy-to-digest insights about their condition, a carefully orchestrated timeline, and a process that follows validated behavioral science protocols. That’s hard to squeeze into a phone call. Or a doctor’s visit, for that matter.

The world urgently needs better ways to bring behavior change therapies to the masses, and advancements in digital tech are finally enabling us to orchestrate the necessary ingredients to make that happen in a clinically meaningful way.

That’s doesn’t make it easy. In fact, it’s effectively pioneering a new class of medicine, often dubbed “digital therapeutics.” But any clinically-meaningful digital therapeutic needs to clear two significant
hurdles. One, it needs to genuinely engage and inspire the patient, both initially and over time. Two, it must also unequivocally demonstrate efficacy to the medical community by rooting itself in the best science and by producing clinically-significant outcomes, just as any traditional drug is expected to do.

That’s why, until recently, most available health apps couldn’t truly be categorized as digital therapeutics. For instance, a study in 2012 showed that very few of the top 50 smoking cessation apps available at the time abided by evidence-based protocols. This high-tech snake oil was not deliberate, but it is a side effect of the fact that very few of the leading behavioral science researchers knowing how to program in Objective C or Ruby on Rails. Companies looking to truly pioneer in this new category must both establish and exceed the highest scientific standards while building exceptional online experiences. The good news is that is starting to happen.

Emerging in the white hat category are a handful of medically-minded visionaries who have put real clinical rigor into every aspect of their design. For instance, David Van Sickle, a former CDC “epidemiologist intelligence officer,” and now the CEO and Co-Founder of Propeller Health, built a GPS-enabled sensor for asthma inhalers that links to an elegantly designed app — every puff is mapped and time-stamped, allowing patients and doctors to spot patterns in ‘random’ attacks and identify previously unknown triggers.

Another example is Jenna Tregarthen, a PhD candidate in clinical psychology and eating disorder specialist. She rallied a team of engineers, entrepreneurs, and fellow psychologists to develop Recovery Record, a digital therapy that helps patients gain control over their eating disorder by enabling them to self-monitor for destructive thoughts or actions, follow meal plans, achieve behavior goals, and message a therapist instantly when they need support.

Momentum for the promise of digital therapeutics is building. A massive surge in digital health investing reflects how rapidly confidence in this space is growing. In ten years, we have no doubt that your doctor will recommend a digital program for your depression either instead of, or in addition to, a pill. Your insomnia, kidney stones, or lower back pain might be treated by an experience centered around an iOS app. We can clearly see a future where a doctor’s prescription sends you to an immersive online experience as often as it does to a pharmacy.

The world is finally entering a new era of effective, scalable, and life-saving change, all delivered through the other end of an internet connection. For three out of four of us, that change can’t come soon enough.

 

RWJF Report: Personal Data for the Public Good

Solid report on personal health data. Interesting observation re. (lack of) alignment between research and business objectives… i.e. public vs private goods?

http://www.rwjf.org/en/research-publications/find-rwjf-research/2014/03/personal-data-for-the-public-good.html

Report: http://www.rwjf.org/content/dam/farm/reports/reports/2014/rwjf411080

PDF:

1. Executive Summary
Individuals are tracking a variety of health-related data via a growing number of wearable devices and smartphone apps. More and more data relevant to health are also being captured passively as people communicate with one another on social networks, shop, work, or do any number of activities that leave “digital footprints.”
Almost all of these forms of “personal health data” (PHD) are outside of the mainstream of traditional health care, public health or health research. Medical, behavioral, social and public health research still largely rely on traditional sources of health data such as those collected in clinical trials, sifting through electronic medical records, or conducting periodic surveys.
Self-tracking data can provide better measures of everyday behavior and lifestyle and can fill in gaps in more traditional clinical data collection, giving us a more complete picture of health. With support from the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, the Health Data Exploration (HDE) project conducted a study to better understand the barriers to using personal health data in research from the individuals who track the data about their own personal health, the companies that market self-tracking devices, apps or services and aggregate and manage that data, and the researchers who might use the data as part of their research.
Perspectives
Through a series of interviews and surveys, we discovered strong interest in contributing and using PHD for research. It should be noted that, because our goal was to access individuals and researchers who are already generating or using digital self-tracking data, there was some bias in our survey findings—participants tended to have more education and higher household incomes than the general population. Our survey also drew slightly more white and Asian participants and more female participants than in the general population.
Individuals were very willing to share their self-tracking data for research, in particular if they knew the data would advance knowledge in the fields related to PHD such as public health, health care, computer science and social and behavioral science. Most expressed an explicit desire to have their information shared anonymously and we discovered a wide range of thoughts and concerns regarding thoughts over privacy.

Equally, researchers were generally enthusiastic about the potential for using self-tracking data in their research. Researchers see value in these kinds of data and think these data can answer important research questions. Many consider it to be of equal quality and importance to data from existing high quality clinical or public health data sources.
Companies operating in this space noted that advancing research was a worthy goal but not their primary business concern. Many companies expressed interest in research conducted outside of their company that would validate the utility of their device or application but noted the critical importance of maintaining their customer relationships. A number were open to data sharing with academics but noted the slow pace and administrative burden of working with universities as a challenge.
In addition to this considerable enthusiasm, it seems a new PHD research ecosystem may well be emerging. Forty-six percent of the researchers who participated in the study have already used self-tracking data in their research, and 23 percent of the researchers have already collaborated with application, device, or social media companies.
The Personal Health Data Research Ecosystem
A great deal of experimentation with PHD is taking place. Some individuals are experimenting with personal data stores or sharing their data directly with researchers in a small set of clinical experiments. Some researchers have secured one-off access to unique data sets for analysis. A small number of companies, primarily those with more of a health research focus, are working with others to develop data commons to regularize data sharing with the public and researchers.
SmallStepsLab serves as an intermediary between Fitbit, a data rich company, and academic researchers via a “preferred status” API held by the company. Researchers pay SmallStepsLab for this access as well as other enhancements that they might want.
These promising early examples foreshadow a much larger set of activities with the potential to transform how research is conducted in medicine, public health and the social and behavioral sciences.

Opportunities and Obstacles
There is still work to be done to enhance the potential to generate knowledge out of personal health data:

Privacy and Data Ownership: Among individuals surveyed, the dominant condition (57%) for making their PHD available for research was an assurance of privacy for their data, and over 90% of respondents said that it was important that the data be anonymous. Further, while some didn’t care who owned the data they generate, a clear majority wanted to own or at least share ownership of the data with the company that collected it.

Informed Consent: Researchers are concerned about the privacy of PHD as well as respecting the rights of those who provide it. For most of our researchers, this came down to a straightforward question of whether there is informed consent. Our research found that current methods of informed consent are challenged by the ways PHD are being used and reused in research. A variety of new approaches to informed consent are being evaluated and this area is ripe for guidance to assure optimal outcomes for all stakeholders.

Data Sharing and Access: Among individuals, there is growing interest in, as well as willingness and opportunity to, share personal health data with others. People now share these data with others with similar medical conditions in online groups like PatientsLikeMe or Crohnology, with the intention to learn as much as possible about mutual health concerns. Looking across our data, we find that individuals’ willingness to share is dependent on what data is shared, how the data will be used, who will have access to the data and when, what regulations and legal protections are in place, and the level of compensation or benefit (both personal and public).

Data Quality: Researchers highlighted concerns about the validity of PHD and lack of standardization of devices. While some of this may be addressed as the consumer health device, apps and services market matures, reaching the optimal outcome for researchers might benefit from strategic engagement of important stakeholder groups.

We are reaching a tipping point. More and more people are tracking their health, and there is a growing number of tracking apps and devices on the market with many more in development. There is overwhelming enthusiasm from individuals and researchers to use this data to better understand health. To maximize personal data for the public good, we must develop creative solutions that allow individual rights to be respected while providing access to high-quality and relevant PHD for research, that balance open science with intellectual property, and that enable productive and mutually beneficial collaborations between the private sector and the academic research community.

Healthy Ageing Japan-style

 

http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/saturdayextra/japan27s-aging-population/5397864

Japan’s ageing population

Saturday 26 April 2014 8:30AM

A quarter of Japanese people are now aged over 65, with predictions that nearly half the population will reach that age by the end of the century.

In Japan people don’t just live longer, they work longer, stay healthier and approach old age in some interesting and innovative ways.

One policy initiative is old age day care which is well used and well organised in Japan.

Guests

Professor John Creighton Campbell
Visiting scholar, Institute of Gerontology at Tokyo University

Credits

Presenter
Dr Norman Swan
Producer
Kate Pearcy