Preventative Medicine KILLS return business… first day of med school.
Originally seen in Dr Michael Greger lecture.
Going back to first principles to examine what really matters in a therapeutic relationship and discovering its the relationship. That a health coach previously working at Dunkin’ Donuts might be more effective than a Harvard trained doctor might be difficult to compute, but makes complete sense.
Iora Health seem to be limit testing this idea.
Iora Health CEO Rushika Fernandopulle at the WIRED Data | Life Conference in New York City. Photo: Christopher Farber.
Suzanne Koven was walking in the rain when she slipped, fell and fractured her right shoulder. It took surgery and months of physical therapy to heal.
“The recovery was miserable,” she said. But it came with a silver lining.
Koven is a primary care doctor at Massachusetts General Hospital, and the hospital insisted that for her first three weeks back she had to take twice as long to do her job. Suddenly, she had the luxury to actually spend time with her patients, to talk with them about what was wrong and how she could help.
“It was the happiest time in my career,” she said. “It completely transformed the nature of the interaction [with patients].”
That wouldn’t last. When her three weeks were up, Koven had to rejoin a system that rewards quantity over quality. She was back to seeing 20 patients a day.
But just a mile away from her office, at Iora Health’s main offices in Cambridge, Rushika Fernandopulle was busy brewing just the kind of medicine that inspired Koven to go into primary care more than 20 years earlier — a practice that, at its core, is about building relationships. At Iora Health’s clinics, teams of doctors, nurses and health coaches work together to take care of patients holistically, bundling together mental health services, peer support groups and nutrition counseling with more traditional primary care services like physical exams.
This model builds on a team-based approach to medicine known as patient-centered care, itself part of a larger movement to cut costs and improve health by upping the quality of primary care. The idea behind it is if people’s baseline health is better, the system will have to spend less money paying for expensive emergency procedures later.
Large healthcare outfits, university systems and Silicon Valley upstarts have tried this approach with varying results before. But Iora wants to take this concept a step further by actively going after the most expensive, high-risk patients, spending more time and resources on each one, and investing in building in-house data analytics and IT tools. Along the way, the company is killing the standard model, in which doctors are paid for each service they provide, and redefining what a health provider is.
“What’s key to our model is to build a team around the patient” in a data-centric way, said Fernandopulle at the WIRED Data|Life conference in New York City yesterday. They take data from hospitals, pharmacy benefits companies and patients to monitor how patients are doing and to identify what patients to treat in the first place.
So far, he says, this approach has met impressive results. The company has been able to reduce emergency room visits by 48 percent and hospitalizations by 41 percent, resulting in an overall 15 percent reduction in healthcare costs in pilot studies at its four practices in New Hampshire, Nevada, New York and Massachusetts. Plus, the physicians in his clinics tend to be happier.
It’s the type of effect that Koven noticed during her three-week stint working at half her normal pace. She doesn’t have hard data to back this up, but she noticed that it took her patients roughly 15 minutes to start confiding in her. During a normal 15 minute visit, the patient would never get to that point. More open communication, she says, also made her less likely to order unnecessary expensive tests and medications.
At Iora, that’s standard partly because of the way the payment system works.
A provider pays a lump sum of money, usually between $150 and $200 a month, for each patient instead of forking over money per service. Then it’s up to the team to decide how to best treat the communities they serve. The system only works if the clinic keeps patients healthy. It behooves Iora to figure out exactly what’s wrong and tailor treatment to its patient population.
Sometimes that means cutting back on medications or the number of specialists patients see. It can also involve phone calls, text messages, video conferencing through Skype, or group sessions like Diabetes Clubs during which patients socialize and teach themselves how to best manage their disease.
To do this in a data-driven way, the team surveys patients for feedback and uses that information to tweak how care is delivered. It actively collects blood pressure, blood sugar and prescription refilling data to make sure patients are sticking to their health plan. If they don’t refill a prescription, for example, the system creates a task for a health coach to follow up with the patient.
Fernandopulle recounted the story of “Mr. Edwin,” a patient with end-stage renal disease and anxiety. His panic attacks sometimes prevented him from getting the dialysis that was keeping him alive, which resulted in 17 emergency room visits and $280,000 in healthcare costs.
His health coach asked him what calmed him down and he said listening to music. She used Iora’s discretionary budget to buy him a $45 iPod onto which the health coach loaded merengue music, Mr. Edwin’s favorite. Mr. Edwin took his merengue music with him to dialysis, and, Fernandopulle says, that quelled his anxiety and prevented expensive ER visits. This would have never happened in a traditional healthcare setting, he said.
Because that hinges on having a good rapport with patients, the company puts a premium on social skills. A background in health isn’t even necessary to get hired as a health coach. For example, before joining the company, some of Iora’s best health coaches worked as cashiers at Target and Dunkin’ Donuts, possibly the last place a traditional healthcare system would look for talent.
“It’s one of the most innovative models out there. What they’re doing is trying to start to think outside the traditional confines of who can provide care,” said Ashish Jha, a professor of health policy at the Harvard School of Public Health. “You don’t need to go to medical school to be a great health coach, to connect with people and motivate them. Those skills exist much more broadly.”
But, he says, that’s not an approach the healthcare establishment is necessarily ready to adopt in its entirety. The concept of building practices around team-oriented care might be scalable, but a strong leader is critical to make this model successful. “It would take a very special, very large healthcare provider to tolerate this approach. The idea that you’re going to get a health coach from Dunkin’ Donuts just seems hard to tolerate.”
Then, there’s the question of whether small companies like Iora can really make a dent in the country’s $2.7 trillion healthcare bill. There are hundreds of experiments and pilots around the country trying to redefine primary care, and it’s still unclear what will work, says Kevin Tabb, the CEO of Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center in Boston. ”It’s not clear that a small company has the resources to really develop sophisticated systems on their own. Google couldn’t pull it off.”
Still, Tabb says, if one or several of these works out, it could still have a big impact.
And it wouldn’t have to be as scalable as you might think. “Five percent of the sickest patients are responsible for more than 50 percent of the healthcare spend,” Tabb said. “It may be that we only need to provide intensive care to a small percentage of the population.” What Tabb means by “intensive care” is not the intensive care unit of a hospital, but the type of personalized, regular care experimental primary care practices like Iora provide.
What all this says to Koven is that healthcare is very much a service industry. And what sets a good service apart is the ability to listen to customers well and to make them feel like what they say matters. That builds trust.
“Primary care — or my idealized version of primary care — actually allows for much more of that storytelling,” Koven said. “I don’t think of talking with patients and getting to know more about them as some warm and fluffy add-on. To me, it’s what medicine is.”
And that’s the type of medicine Iora Health is trying to kickstart.
Source: http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2013/11/wired-data-life-iora-health/#!
Post-change makers festival closing event, here’s a first go at capturing my main beefs with the health system – a little rough around the edges but captures the gist:
Appearance | Reality | Vision | |
Mission | Brittle health system | Bankrupt sickness market | Sustainable learning wellness market |
Universality | Universal healthcare | Safety net + PHI | Universal |
Payment | Fee for care | Fee for activity | Fee for outcomes |
Leadership | Run by experts | Run by amateurs | Run by the finest minds |
Levers | Doctors in hospitals prescribing pharmaceuticals and performing procedures | Unmanaged social determinants with doctors spruiking pills and procedures | Actively managed social determinants featuring broccoli magnates |
That said, and given the issues and concerns we discussed, I suspect some (if not all) of what needs to happen, has to happen alongside or entirely outside the existing system. Hmm.
I just returned from the closing event for this: http://changemakersfestival.org/
I didn’t have a chance to properly speak with Jenny about our discussion, but got the impression that there simply wasn’t the kind of support for think tanks here that existed overseas.
That said, I did have a reasonable chat with Nicholas Gruen – an very interesting economist and thinker – and suspect there may be an alternate angle to pursue… will keep you posted.
From their website:
Jointly Health is a venture-backed company headquartered in Orange County, CA. In collaboration with Qualcomm Life, Jointly Health provides a very disruptive, end-to-end Remote Patient Monitoring and Analytics Platform that can detect changes in health states much earlier and with greater specificity. Jointly Health also makes this information actionable by healthcare professionals inside their existing workflow.
The first application of Jointly Health is to reduce preventable hospital admissions in patients with complex chronic disease. In the U.S. there are 4 million preventable hospitalizations resulting in $88 billion in preventable costs and unquantifiable amounts of human suffering. Remote patient monitoring has the potential to reduce these hospitalizations but is plagued by missed intervention opportunities, false alarms and inefficiencies. Jointly Health solves these problems.
Jointly’s proprietary platform utilizes a number of advanced technologies including Predictive Analytics, Complex-Event Processing, Real-Time Analytics, Signal Processing and Machine Learning and has four distinct advantages.
1. Can collect a wide variety of remote health data at high velocity and volume. This includes multiple types of physiological data, human observational, environmental, contextual, and other meta data.
2. Has an adaptable ecosystem that enables our customers to build complex disease models which we can then execute.
3. Can remotely detect changes in health states much earlier and with greater specificity.
4. Provides healthcare professionals with a closed-loop decision support system for intervention optimization.
————-
From: http://www.medgadget.com/2013/11/futuremed-day-4-the-end-of-the-beginning.html
Kreindler elaborated on the value of high speed data for applications including remote patient monitoring and analytics to proactively detect deteriorating health states before they being to detract from quality of life. The energetic talk concluded by touching on how Jointly Health, in collaboration with Qualcomm Life, harnesses big data and analytics to make “information actionable.”
Heyworth is the founder and former CEO of the ALS Therapy Development Institute (ALS TDI), a non-profit biotechnology organization driven to developing treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The first half of Heyworth’s talk focused on his emotional motivation for ALS TDI, which began when his younger brother Stephen was diagnosed with ALS. Heyworth’s investigation into the options available for managing his brother’s disease revealed a disturbing fact: as much as 80% of ALS research outcomes could not be replicated, making much of the support for ALS clinical trials statistically unsubstantiated.
Heyworth raised the question of how we can move forward when there are faults in the data at the heart of our assumptions. The fact that ALS, considered one of the best-researched medical conditions, might have no real supportable data drove Heyworth to establish ALS TDI in 1999 with the aim to champion a new model of disease research based outside of academia and for-profit organizations. Heyworth’s story was captured by author Jonathan Weiner in His Brother’s Keeper and by the PBS documentary So Much So Fast. Heywood’s discussion also touched on his work as co-founder of PatientsLikeMe, an online resource for disease-specific medical information. The tool allows patients to track their diseases and share this information with others dealing with the same conditions. PatientsLikeMe disrupts the current system of clinical trials with patient-driven databases that provide insight into the efficacy of specific treatments.
Taken from: http://www.medgadget.com/2013/11/futuremed-day-4-the-end-of-the-beginning.html
The more I look at and think about cognitive behavioural therapy, the more I become persuaded that it is way less complicated than it sounds, but at the same time, quite a powerful way to change someone’s mind and/or behaviour.
In an odd way, it’s like academics and researchers are catching up to business, discovering that it’s possible to influence thinking in others using methods such as speaking with people, or sms’ing them, then applying the term cognitive behavioural therapy, when in actual fact, it’s just advertising (or promotion, or whatever well-worn and proven marketing modality best applies).
The 2013 Melbourne Festival of Ideas had a session on obesity with a spirited panel discussion laying out all the arguments from all the protagonists.
Full session: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-JiVTHAhKlQ
Radio National First Bite (edited version): http://www.abc.net.au/radionational/programs/rnfirstbite/are-we-eating-ourselves-to-death3f/5076592
If the urologists behaved any more egregiously, they’d be drifting into crimes against humanity. It’s good to see the Cancer Council calling this out for what it is: “A disservice to men”. It’s also time for these ghouls to cease veiling their self-interest as their patients’.
Catherine Hanrahan all articles by this author
A DRAMATIC increase in prostate cancer cases has prompted Cancer Council NSW to call for men to think carefully before being tested, but urologists refute the suggestion men are being treated unnecessarily.
A new study shows the number of prostate cancer diagnoses in Australia jumped 276% over the 20 years from 1987 to 2007.
This is a result of increased testing, lead author Associate Professor Freddy Sitas of Cancer Council NSW, said.
He said that even if a positive result is correct, unless they operate, doctors have no foolproof way of knowing if the cancer is aggressive or relatively harmless.
“Saving lives is our priority, but we urgently need a better test,” Professor Sitas said.
“The tests have saved men with aggressive forms of the disease, but at a high cost.”
A 27% drop in the death rate was observed over the study period, he said.
However, the increase in new cases is much greater than this.
“This indicates that many men were diagnosed with cancers that would not have harmed them.”
However, the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand has strongly refuted claims by the Cancer Council NSW that men have been done a “great disservice” by the growth in prostate cancer diagnoses, and have been subjected to unnecessary treatment.
“Twenty years ago we didn’t have a test to diagnose prostate cancer, which meant most men presented with advanced, incurable disease,” Professor Mark Frydenberg, the Urological Society’s Vice-President, said.
Many low risk cancers were more typically observed, not treated, he said, with active surveillance, now considered a mainstream pathway.
The University of NSW’s Professor Mark Harris says: “Until we have a better method of screening, men need to be fully informed about the pros and cons of testing.”
Cancer Epidemiol 2013; online 1 November
Behavior change is difficult, but to date it has dominated by industries, such as the processed food industry, who have mastered the art of mass market behaviour change through a withering combination of product research, development and engineering, marketing, advertising and promotion, all founded on an unstoppable and lucrative business model. At this moment in history, industry is the unopposed, global behaviour change super power. Serious capital investment with serious returns but with the unfortunate side-effect of producing a global epidemic of non-communicable disease.
The institutions charged with protecting the public’s health have been caught flat footed. Rather than trying to neutralise industry’s behaviour change efforts, medically-dominated health systems have instead chosen to layer their own lucrative pharmaceutical and surgical business model on top.
Doctors quite legitimately pay lip service to the “diet and exercise” mantra because they know it doesn’t work. And why doesn’t it work? Because anyone can say eat healthier food and exercise, thus making it difficult to justify their years of training and high fees. It’s much better for doctors to note “diet and exercise”, but then pump the drug and surgery options.
So what needs to happen?
A countervailing super power must be established. Not one founded around a powerful business model, but rather a movement of interested citizens, concerned by the grotesque monentization of the population’s health. In effect, a competing super power in the behaviour change arms race.
Key characteristics:
Funding sources:
Inspirations