Weltschmerz

Weltschmerz (from the German, meaning world-pain or world-wearinesspronounced [ˈvɛltʃmɛɐ̯ts]) is a term coined by the German author Jean Paul Richter and denotes the kind of feeling experienced by someone who understands that physical reality can never satisfy the demands of the mind. This kind of world view was widespread among several romantic authors such as Lord ByronGiacomo LeopardiFrançois-René de ChateaubriandAlfred de MussetNikolaus LenauHermann Hesse, and Heinrich Heine. It is also used to denote the feeling of sadness when thinking about the evils of the world.

The modern meaning of Weltschmerz in the German language is the psychological pain caused by sadness that can occur when realizing that someone’s own weaknesses are caused by the inappropriateness and cruelty of the world and (physical and social) circumstances. Weltschmerz in this meaning can cause depressionresignation and escapism, and can become a mental problem (compare to Hikikomori). The modern meaning should also be compared with the concept of anomie, or a kind of alienation, that Émile Durkheimwrote about in his sociological treatise Suicide.

From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weltschmerz

The gist of my concerns…

Post-change makers festival closing event, here’s a first go at capturing my main beefs with the health system – a little rough around the edges but captures the gist:

 

  Appearance Reality Vision
Mission Brittle health system Bankrupt sickness market Sustainable learning wellness market
Universality Universal healthcare Safety net + PHI Universal
Payment Fee for care Fee for activity Fee for outcomes
Leadership Run by experts Run by amateurs Run by the finest minds
Levers Doctors in hospitals prescribing pharmaceuticals and performing procedures Unmanaged social determinants with doctors spruiking pills and procedures Actively managed social determinants featuring broccoli magnates

That said, and given the issues and concerns we discussed, I suspect some (if not all) of what needs to happen, has to happen alongside or entirely outside the existing system. Hmm.

I just returned from the closing event for this: http://changemakersfestival.org/

I didn’t have a chance to properly speak with Jenny about our discussion, but got the impression that there simply wasn’t the kind of support for think tanks here that existed overseas.

That said, I did have a reasonable chat with Nicholas Gruen – an very interesting economist and thinker – and suspect there may be an alternate angle to pursue… will keep you posted.

What REALLY Kills Us

Terrific Daniel Katz piece on LinkedIn on the actual causes of death.

Heart disease, cancer, stroke and diabetes are not causes, they are diseases.

The 1993 JAMA article “Actual Causes of Death” lays it out, and the top three causes of premature death, which account for 80% of the risk, are:

  1. tobacco
  2. diet
  3. exercise

Population-based research published in 2009 showed that people who ate well, exercise routinely, avoided tobacco, and controlled their weight had an 80% lower probability across their entire life span of developing ANY major chronic disease- heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, dementia, etc.- than those who smoked, ate badly, didn’t exercise, and lost control of their weight

 http://www.linkedin.com/today/post/article/20131110133420-23027997-what-really-kills-us

What REALLY Kills Us

Heart disease is not the leading cause of death among men and women in the United States. Cancer, stroke, pulmonary disease, diabetes, and dementia are not the other leading causes of early mortality and/or chronic malady either.

Don’t get me wrong- these are the very diseases immediately responsible for an enormous loss of years from life, and an even greater loss of life from years. In that context, heart disease is indeed the most common immediate precipitant of early death among women and men alike. Cancer, stroke, and diabetes do indeed follow close behind. It’s just that these diseases aren’t really causes. They are effects.

We got this message loud, clear, and first- at least in the modern era- in what really should have been a culture-changing research paper published in JAMA in 1993 entitled ‘Actual Causes of Death in the United States.’ In that analysis, two leading epidemiologists, Drs. William Foege and J. Michael McGinnis, looked into the factors that accounted for the chronic diseases and other insults that immediately preceded premature deaths. When they were done crunching numbers, they had a list of ten factors that accounted for almost all of the premature deaths in our country every year.

Let’s digress to note we cannot ‘prevent’ death. But what makes death tragic is not that it happens- we are all mortal- but that it happens too soon. And even worse, that it happens after a long period of illness drains away vitality, capacity, and the pleasure of living. Chronic disease can produce a long, lingering twilight of quasi-living, before adding to that injury the insult of a premature death. And that, we can prevent. We can preserve vitality, and we can postpone death to its rightful time, at the end of our full life expectancy.

Now back to our regularly scheduled program. There were two astounding things about McGinnis and Foege’s list of ten factors*. First, we as individuals have substantial control over everything on the list, and virtually complete control over most of the entries. Second, just the first three factors on the list – tobacco, diet, and physical activity – accounted for fully 80% of the action. In other words, the actual, underlying “cause” of premature death in our country fully 8 times in 10 comes down to bad use of our feet (lack of physical activity), our forks (poor dietary choices), and/or our fingers (holding cigarettes).

I trust you immediately see the up-side to this. If bad use of feet, forks, and fingers accounts for 80% of premature deaths (and a bounty of chronic disease), it stands to reason that optimal use of feet, forks, and fingers could eliminate up to 80% of all premature mortality and chronic illness. This proves to be exactly true. Feet, forks, and fingers are the master levers of medical destiny.

We know this not just from McGinnis and Foege’s seminal paper, but from a steady drumbeat of corroborating research spanning the two decades since. Scientists at the CDC replicated the findings in the original paper in an update a decade later. Population-based research published in 2009 showed that people who ate well, exercise routinely, avoided tobacco, and controlled their weight had an 80% lower probability across their entire life span of developing ANY major chronic disease- heart disease, cancer, stroke, diabetes, dementia, etc.- than those who smoked, ate badly, didn’t exercise, and lost control of their weight. Flip the switch on any of these factors from bad to good, and the lifetime risk of serious chronic disease was reduced by nearly 50%. But firing on all four cylinders produced a greater net benefit than perhaps any advance in the history of medicine. These very findings have been replicated again, and again– and have been shown to extend that same influence over the expression of our very genes. DNA is not destiny, and to a substantial extent- dinner is. By changing what we eat and how we live, we can alter the expression of our very genes in a way that immunizes us against chronic disease occurrence, recurrence, or progression.

And so it is we have the knowledge to eliminate fully 80% of all chronic disease and premature death. The contention isn’t even controversial.

But knowledge, alas, isn’t power unless it is put to use. And for the most part, we have not leveraged the astounding memo we first got in 1993. Not only have we failed to slash rates of chronic disease, we are actually seeing them rise- with onset at ever-younger ages. We could bequeath to our children a world in which 8 times in 10, heart attacks and strokes and cancer simply don’t happen. Instead, should current trends persist, we will bequeath to them a world in which they and their peers succumb to just such preventable calamities more often and earlier than we.

So current trends cannot persist- and that, bluntly, is why I wrote Disease Proof. As a society, we clearly know the ‘what,’ but as individuals and families; spouses and siblings; parents and grandparents- most of us, just as clearly, don’t know how. How, despite the challenges of modern living, do we adopt, maintain, and enjoy a healthful diet? How, despite those same challenges, do we fit fitness in? How do we navigate around other challenges, from sleep deprivation and lack of energy, to overwhelming stress, to chronic pain?

These questions have answers, and I know them. I know them not because I’m special, but because it’s my job to know them. Pilots know how to fly planes; nuclear physicists know how to split atoms. I am a health expert, and I know how to get to health and weight control from here. Like any worthwhile thing, it requires a skill set- but we are used to that. We had to learn how to read and ride our bikes. We had to learn how to drive our cars and use our smart phones. Every worthwhile undertaking in our lives has involved someone who already knew how teaching us. Our job was to learn, and apply.

Health and weight control are exactly the same. In Disease Proof, I share the full skill set I apply myself.

We could, as a culture, eliminate 80% of all chronic disease. But my family and yours cannot afford to keep on waitin’ on the world to change. By taking matters into our own hands, we can lose weight and find health right now. We can reduce our personal risk of chronic disease, and that of the people we love, by that very same 80%. We can make our lives not just longer, but better.

What really kills us prematurely, and all too often imposes years of misery before hand, isn’t a list of chronic diseases, but the factors that cause those diseases. What really takes years from life and life from years is a willingness to know WHAT, yet neglect the opportunity to know HOW. What really kills us is the failure to turn what we know and have long known, into what we do. We can change that, and substantially disease-proof ourselves and those we love, any time we’re ready. I hope that’s now, because waiting- is really killing us.

-fin

DISEASE PROOF is available in bookstores nationwide and at:

Dr. David L. Katz; www.davidkatzmd.com
www.turnthetidefoundation.org

http://www.facebook.com/pages/Dr-David-L-Katz/114690721876253
http://twitter.com/DrDavidKatz
http://www.linkedin.com/pub/david-l-katz-md-mph/7/866/479/

 

*the list is: tobacco, diet and activity patterns, alcohol, microbial agents, toxic agents, firearms, sexual behavior, motor vehicles, and illicit use of drugs

self-limiting repulsion

Over time, humanity has demonstrated a increasing tendency toward the repulsive.

Is it possible that humanity might repulse itself so much that begins to impact on population growth?

Could this be the root cause of plummeting birth rates in developed economies?

Jointly Health – analytics for remote monitoring

Jointly Health is the first Big Data Analytics and Closed-Loop Decision Support Platform for Remote Patient Monitoring

From their website:

Company Overview

Jointly Health is a venture-backed company headquartered in Orange County, CA. In collaboration with Qualcomm Life, Jointly Health provides a very disruptive, end-to-end Remote Patient Monitoring and Analytics Platform that can detect changes in health states much earlier and with greater specificity. Jointly Health also makes this information actionable by healthcare professionals inside their existing workflow.

First Application

The first application of Jointly Health is to reduce preventable hospital admissions in patients with complex chronic disease. In the U.S. there are 4 million preventable hospitalizations resulting in $88 billion in preventable costs and unquantifiable amounts of human   suffering. Remote patient monitoring has the potential to reduce these hospitalizations but is plagued by missed intervention opportunities, false alarms and inefficiencies. Jointly Health solves these problems.

Uniqueness

Jointly’s proprietary platform utilizes a number of advanced technologies including Predictive Analytics, Complex-Event Processing, Real-Time Analytics, Signal Processing and Machine Learning and has four distinct advantages.

1. Can collect a wide variety of remote health data at high velocity and volume. This includes multiple types of physiological data, human observational, environmental, contextual, and other meta data.

2. Has an adaptable ecosystem that enables our customers to build complex disease models which we can then execute.

3. Can remotely detect changes in health states much earlier and with greater specificity.

4. Provides healthcare professionals with a closed-loop decision support system for intervention optimization.

————-

From: http://www.medgadget.com/2013/11/futuremed-day-4-the-end-of-the-beginning.html

Kreindler elaborated on the value of high speed data for applications including remote patient monitoring and analytics to proactively detect deteriorating health states before they being to detract from quality of life. The energetic talk concluded by touching on how Jointly Health, in collaboration with Qualcomm Life, harnesses big data and analytics to make “information actionable.”

 

His Brother’s Keeper – The PatientsLikeMe story

Heyworth is the founder and former CEO of the ALS Therapy Development Institute (ALS TDI), a non-profit biotechnology organization driven to developing treatments for amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS). The first half of Heyworth’s talk focused on his emotional motivation for ALS TDI, which began when his younger brother Stephen was diagnosed with ALS. Heyworth’s investigation into the options available for managing his brother’s disease revealed a disturbing fact: as much as 80% of ALS research outcomes could not be replicated, making much of the support for ALS clinical trials statistically unsubstantiated.

Heyworth raised the question of how we can move forward when there are faults in the data at the heart of our assumptions. The fact that ALS, considered one of the best-researched medical conditions, might have no real supportable data drove Heyworth to establish ALS TDI in 1999 with the aim to champion a new model of disease research based outside of academia and for-profit organizations. Heyworth’s story was captured by author Jonathan Weiner in His Brother’s Keeper and by the PBS documentary So Much So Fast.  Heywood’s discussion also touched on his work as co-founder of PatientsLikeMe, an online resource for disease-specific medical information. The tool allows patients to track their diseases and share this information with others dealing with the same conditions. PatientsLikeMe disrupts the current system of clinical trials with patient-driven databases that provide insight into the efficacy of specific treatments.

Taken from: http://www.medgadget.com/2013/11/futuremed-day-4-the-end-of-the-beginning.html

AdShame saying stop, or we’ll say stop again?

A commendable element of a multi-prong approach… every bit helps.

adShame showcases the ways the alcohol and food industry regularly flout the rules when it comes to responsible advertising.

Our aim is to show that self-regulation is not working, and changes are needed to ensure that regulation protects children and young people from the harmful effects of alcohol and unhealthy food advertising. 

http://www.adshame.org.au/

Advertising… the original Cognitive Behavioural Therapy.

The more I look at and think about cognitive behavioural therapy, the more I become persuaded that it is way less complicated than it sounds, but at the same time, quite a powerful way to change someone’s mind and/or behaviour.

In an odd way, it’s like academics and researchers are catching up to business, discovering that it’s possible to influence thinking in others using methods such as speaking with people, or sms’ing them, then applying the term cognitive behavioural therapy, when in actual fact, it’s just advertising (or promotion, or whatever well-worn and proven marketing modality best applies).

Urologists… WTF?

If the urologists behaved any more egregiously, they’d be drifting into crimes against humanity. It’s good to see the Cancer Council calling this out for what it is: “A disservice to men”. It’s also time for these ghouls to cease veiling their self-interest as their patients’.

http://www.medicalobserver.com.au/news/cancer-council-urges-men-to-think-carefully-before-prostate-testing

Cancer Council urges men to think carefully before prostate testing

Catherine Hanrahan   all articles by this author

A DRAMATIC increase in prostate cancer cases has prompted Cancer Council NSW to call for men to think carefully before being tested, but urologists refute the suggestion men are being treated unnecessarily.

A new study shows the number of prostate cancer diagnoses in Australia jumped 276% over the 20 years from 1987 to 2007.

This is a result of increased testing, lead author Associate Professor Freddy Sitas of Cancer Council NSW, said.

He said that even if a positive result is correct, unless they operate, doctors have no foolproof way of knowing if the cancer is aggressive or relatively harmless.

“Saving lives is our priority, but we urgently need a better test,” Professor Sitas said.

“The tests have saved men with aggressive forms of the disease, but at a high cost.”

A 27% drop in the death rate was observed over the study period, he said.

However, the increase in new cases is much greater than this.

“This indicates that many men were diagnosed with cancers that would not have harmed them.”

However, the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand has strongly refuted claims by the Cancer Council NSW that men have been done a “great disservice” by the growth in prostate cancer diagnoses, and have been subjected to unnecessary treatment.

“Twenty years ago we didn’t have a test to diagnose prostate cancer, which meant most men presented with advanced, incurable disease,” Professor Mark Frydenberg, the Urological Society’s Vice-President, said.

Many low risk cancers were more typically observed, not treated, he said, with active surveillance, now considered a mainstream pathway.

The University of NSW’s Professor Mark Harris says: “Until we have a better method of screening, men need to be fully informed about the pros and cons of testing.”

Cancer Epidemiol 2013; online 1 November