Monthly Archives: December 2013
Where the magic happens…
Economist Intelligence Unit – Rethinking Cardiovascular Disease Prevention
Source: http://www.economistinsights.com/healthcare/opinion/heart-darkness%E2%80%94fighting-cvd-all-mind
CVD prevention at population level, such as a “fat tax” or smoking ban, relies heavily on regulation. This is its greatest strength – it can compel healthy behaviour (or seat belt wearing) – but also its greatest potential weakness. It inevitably involves some degree of coercion, which runs the risk of paternalism.It need not involve regulation, however. The same human flaws that are exploited by the food industry to persuade us to buy certain items at the check-out can also be used to persuade us to act in the interests of our own health. The current UK government is attempting to turn psychological weakness into an advantage outside of the legislative framework.
Its Behavioural Insights Team, commonly referred to as the “nudge unit”, is designed to seek “intelligent ways” to support and enable people to make better choices, using insights from behavioural science and medicine instead of increased rulemaking. Many of these goals overlap with CVD prevention, from smoking cessation to encouraging kids to eat healthier foods and walk to school more often. Early successes have brought them to the attention of the Obama administration in the US.
Besides the difficulties of making positive lifestyle changes, non-adherence to treatment is another significant obstacle to effective CVD prevention. Even after suffering a CVD incident, some patients forget to take their medication; other patients opt not to complete a course of treatment for other reasons, ranging from concerns about costs, the inconvenience involved with travel, to feelings of despondency caused by depression and anxiety. At its most anodyne, individuals frequently stop taking drugs prescribed for prevention after they feel better and think themselves cured.
This is part of a much wider medical problem: in the rich world adherence to treatment for all diseases is around 50%. Recognising the commercial opportunities here, private enterprise is looking to play a greater role. Earlier this year a US company called WellDoc launched a smartphone product aimed at giving type 2 diabetics better management of their treatment, through tailoured advice and motivational coaching. In the UK, meanwhile, a start-up calledImpact Health is developing a similar health psychology smartphone product to increase adherence to treatment among sufferers of Crohn’s disease.
CVD patients stand to benefit from such development in medical technology, although they may have to wait a little while yet. Impact Health’s online platform requires patients to have a smartphone. For this reason the start-up is targeting Crohn’s first and not CVD. As David Knull, one of its directors, explains, the profile of the average sufferer is generally around 30 years old—far younger than the average CVD patient, and much more likely to have a smartphone.
Report source: http://www.economistinsights.com/healthcare/analysis/heart-matter
Report PDF: The heart of the matter – Rethinking prevention of cardiovascular disease
The heart of the matter: Rethinking prevention of cardiovascular disease is an Economist Intelligence Unit report, sponsored by AstraZeneca. It investigates the health challenges posed by cardiovascular disease (CVD) in the developed and the developing world, and examines the need for a fresh look at prevention.
The report is also available to download in German, French, Italian, Spanish, Portuguese (Brazilian) and Mandarin—see the Multimedia tab
Why read this report
- Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the world’s leading killer. It accounted for 30% of deaths around the globe in 2010 at an estimated total economic cost of over US$850bn
- The common feature of the disease across the world is its disproportionate impact on individuals from lower socio-economic groups
- Prevention could greatly reduce the spread of CVD: reduced smoking rates, improved diets and other primary prevention efforts are responsible for at least half of the reduction in CVD in developed countries in recent decades…
- …but prevention is little used. Governments devote only a small proportion of health spending to prevention of diseases of any kind—typically 3% in developed countries
- Population-wide measures like smoking bans and “fat taxes” yield significant results but require political adeptness to succeed. There is no shortcut for the slow work of changing hearts and minds
- The size of the CVD epidemic is such that a doctor-centred health system will not be able to cope. Innovative ways for nurses and non-medical personnel to provide preventative services are needed
- A growing number of stakeholders are involved in CVD prevention, sharing the burden with governments. Now, greater collaboration across different sectors and interest groups should be encouraged
- Collaboration works when incentives of stakeholders are aligned, including business. Finland’s famed North Karelia project suggests better alignment of interests is crucial to a successful “multi-sectoral” approach
Cardiovascular disease is the dominant epidemic of the 21st century. Dr Srinath Reddy, president of the World Heart Federation
We know a lot about what needs to be done, it just doesn’t get done. Beatriz Champagne, executive director of the InterAmerican Heart Foundation
Action at the country level will decide the future of the cardiovascular epidemic. Dr Shanthi Mendis, director ad interim, management of non-communicable diseases, WHO
Living on the edge with Farzad
- It’s not as simple as you give people information and they change their behavior. It’s information tools that build on that data and build on communities and a much more sophisticated understanding about how behavior changes. What TEDMED is also great at, is understanding the power of marketing. People think of marketing of being about advertising, but marketing is the best knowledge we have about how to change behavior and all those intangibles, those predictably irrational insights, of how and why we do what we do.
- It’s harnessing those, instead of having them lead to worse health – like present value discounting that leads to people wanting to procrastinate and eat that doughnut now instead of going to the gym. Or the power of anchoring, where we fixate on the first thing we see and won’t think objectively about the true risks of things. Or the herd effect, our friend is overweight and so we are more likely to be overweight.
- All those nudges that are possible can be delivered to us ubiquitously and continuously, and we can choose to have them. It’s not some big brother dystopic vision. It’s me saying, ‘I want to be healthier, so I will do something now that will help me overcome and use my irrationality to help me stay healthy. To me, that’s the neat new edge between mobile cloud computing, personal healthcare, behavioral economics, healthcare IT, data science and visualization, design, and marketing. It’s that sphere that has so many possibilities to get us to better health.
http://blog.tedmed.com/?p=4153
The exit interview: Farzad Mostashari on imagination, building healthcare bridges and his biggest “aha” moments
Farzad Mostashari, MD, stepped down from his post as the National Coordinator for Health Information Technology at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), during the first week of October, which was also the first week of the Federal partial shutdown. During his tenure, Dr. Mostashari, who spoke at TEDMED 2011 with Aneesh Chopra, led the creation and definition of meaningful use incentives and tenaciously challenged health care leaders and patients to leverage data in ways to encourage partnerships with patients within the clinical health care team.
Whitney Zatzkin and Stacy Lu had the opportunity to speak with Dr. Mostashari during his last week in office.
WZ: Sometimes, a person will experience an “aha!” moment – a snapshot or event that reveals a new opportunity and challenges him/her to pursue something nontraditional. Was there a critical turning point when you figured out, ‘I’m the guy who should be doing this?’
Yeah, I’ve been fortunate to have a couple of those ‘aha’ moments in my life. One of them was when I was an epidemic intelligence service officer back in 1998, working for the CDC in New York City. I’ve always been interested in edge issues, border issues; things that are on the boundaries between different fields. I was there in public health, but I was interested in what was happening in the rest of the world around electronic transactions and using data in a more agile way.
In disease surveillance we often look back — the way we do claims data now – years later or months later you get the reports and you look for the outbreak, and often times the outbreak’s already come and gone by the time you pick it up. But I started thinking and imagining: What if the second something happens, you can start monitoring it? In New York City the fire department was monitoring ambulance calls. I said, ‘Wow, if we could just categorize those by the type of call, maybe we’ll see some sort of signal in the noise there.’
When I was first able to visualize the trends in the proportion of ambulance dispatches in NYC that were due to respiratory distress, what I saw was flu. What jumped out at me was the sinusoidal curve. Wham! At different times of year, it could be a stutter process – it would go up and you would see this huge increase, followed two weeks later by an increase in deaths. It was like the sky opening up. The evidence was there all along, but I am the first human being on earth to see this. That was validation, for me, of the idea that electronic data opens up worlds. To bring that data to life, to be able to extract meaning from those zeros and ones — that’s life and death. That was my first ‘aha’ moment.
The second aha was after I joined New York City Department of Health, and I started a data shop to build our policy around smoking and tracking chronic diseases. What we realized was that healthcare was leaving lives on the table. There were a lot of lives we could save by doing basic stuff a third-year medical student should do, but we’re not doing it. Related to that – Tom Frieden had a great TEDMED talk about everybody counts.
I said, ‘I want to take six months off and do a sabbatical, and see if there’s anything to using electronic health records to provide those insights, not to save lives by city level, but on the 10 to the 3 level – the 1,000 patient practice. That started the whole journey. None of the vendors at the time had the vision we had, but we finally got someone to work with us and rolled this system out. We called some doctors some 23 times, and did all the work to get to the starting line. Finally, I took Tom on a field visit to see one of the first docs to get the program.
It was a very normal storefront in Harlem, and a nice physician, very caring, very typical. I asked her what she thought of the program. She said, ‘It’s ok. I’m still getting used to it.’ I said, ‘Did you ever look at the registry tab on the right, where you can make a list of your patients? She said no. I said, ok – how many of your elderly patients did you vaccinate for flu this year? She said, ‘I don’t know, about 80 to 85 percent. I’m pretty good at that.’ I said, ‘o.k., let’s run a query.’ And it was actually something like 22 percent. And she said – this was the aha moment – ‘That’s not right.’
That’s generally the feeling the docs have when they get a quality measure report from the health plan. But that’s population health management — the ability to see for the first time ever that everybody counts. And being able to then think about decision support and care protocols to reduce your defect rate. That was the validation that we’re on to something. Without the tools to do this, all the payment changes in the world can’t make healthcare accountable for cost and quality if you can’t see it.
WZ: Everyone has that moment in life when they’re considering all of their career options. As you were considering medical school, what else was on the table?
I actually didn’t think I was going to go to medical school. I was at the Harvard School of Public Health. I was interested in making an impact in public health. I grew up in Iran, and thought I would do international public health work. And then my dad got sick; he had a cardiac issue. The contrast between the immediacy of the laying on of hands of healthcare, and the somewhat abstractness of international public health — the distance, the remove — tipped me into saying, ‘You know, maybe I should go to medical school.’ I’ve been on that edge between healthcare and public health ever since, and always trying to drag the two closer to each other.
SL: Fast forward 20 years. You’re giving another talk at TEDMED. What’s the topic?
TEDMED and Jay Walker’s vision is more powerful in the futurescope, rather than in the retroscope. It’s more powerful to be where we are today and imagine a different future rather than look back and say, ‘Oh, yeah, we’ve done this.’ So what’s the future I would love to imagine?
The most exciting thing – as Jay Walker once mentioned in a talk comparing “medspeed” to “techspeed” – is to fully imagine what will happen if techspeed is brought to healthcare. Right now, there’s all this unrealized value that’s being given away for free that doesn’t show up on any GDP lists – what Tim O’Reilly called “the clothesline paradox.” That kind of possibility brought to medicine, but where software costs $100,000 as opposed to free, and it evolves daily and is more powerful and quicker every day, and it’s beautiful and usable and intuitive, and that’s what people compete on.
And all of that is toward the goal of empowering people. Someone said, maybe it was Jay at TEDMED, that a 14-year-old kid in Africa with a smart phone has more access to information than Bill Clinton did as President. Information is power, and it has changed everything but healthcare. For me the vision is breaking down that wall, so that patients can be empowered and can bind themselves to the mast to use what we’ve learned about how behavior changes.
It’s not as simple as you give people information and they change their behavior. It’s information tools that build on that data and build on communities and a much more sophisticated understanding about how behavior changes. What TEDMED is also great at, is understanding the power of marketing. People think of marketing of being about advertising, but marketing is the best knowledge we have about how to change behavior and all those intangibles, those predictably irrational insights, of how and why we do what we do.
It’s harnessing those, instead of having them lead to worse health – like present value discounting that leads to people wanting to procrastinate and eat that doughnut now instead of going to the gym. Or the power of anchoring, where we fixate on the first thing we see and won’t think objectively about the true risks of things. Or the herd effect, our friend is overweight and so we are more likely to be overweight.
All those nudges that are possible can be delivered to us ubiquitously and continuously, and we can choose to have them. It’s not some big brother dystopic vision. It’s me saying, ‘I want to be healthier, so I will do something now that will help me overcome and use my irrationality to help me stay healthy. To me, that’s the neat new edge between mobile cloud computing, personal healthcare, behavioral economics, healthcare IT, data science and visualization, design, and marketing. It’s that sphere that has so many possibilities to get us to better health.
The thing about the health is, we have a Persian saying: Health is a crown on the head of the healthy that only the sick can see. When you have it, you don’t appreciate it, but when you’re sick and someone you love is sick, there’s nothing better. You would do anything to get that. We need to bring that vision of the crown to everyone and help each of us grab it when we can.
WZ: I noticed you closing your eyes while preparing to answer a question. How do you pursue being able to exercise your imagination, in particular while you’re sitting in a building that’s been marked for being the least imaginative?
Because the world, as it is, is too immediate and real and limiting, sometimes you have to close your eyes to see a different world.
What has been amazing has been to see that, contrary to what people expect, this building is filled with people with untapped, unbound, unfettered imaginations who are slogging through. They’re just trapped. You give them the opening, the smallest bit of daylight to exercise that, and they’re off and running.
I give a lot of credit to Todd Park as our “innovation fellow zero,” He saw the possibility that there are more than two kinds of people in the world, innovators and everybody else. For him, it was about going to create a space where outside innovators can be the catalyst or spark that elevates and permissions the innovation of the career civil servant at CMS in Baltimore. That’s been cool.
SL: What’s your bowtie going to do after you leave HHS? Will we see it lounging on the beach in Boca?
I like the bowtie. I think I’m going to keep it. Perhaps the @FarzadsBowtie Twitter handle is going to go into hibernation, I don’t know. I don’t control it. One of the things the bowtie does for me is help me remember not to get too comfortable.
I once said at the Consumer Health IT Summit – ‘You’re a bunch of misfits – glorious misfits. And I feel like I’m very well suited to be your leader. You know, I always felt American in Iran, and felt Iranian in America when I came here. I felt like a jock among my geeky friends, and like a geek among jocks. For crying out loud, I wear a bowtie! I don’t have to tell you I’m a misfit.’
It’s that sense of not fitting into the world as it is. The world doesn’t fit me. So instead of saying, ‘I need to change,’ this group of people said, ‘The world needs to change.’ That’s the difference between a misfit and a glorious misfit.
The person who doesn’t fit into our healthcare system is the patient. The patient’s preferences don’t fit into the need to maximize revenue and do more procedures. The patient’s family doesn’t fit into the, ‘I want to do an eight-minute visit and get you out the door’ agenda. The patient asking questions doesn’t fit. That’s the change we need to make. It’s not that we need to change. Healthcare needs to change to fit the patient.
Shortly following this interview, Dr. Mostashari left HHS and is now the a visiting fellow of the Engelberg Center for Health Care Reform at the Brookings Institution, where he aims to help clinicians improve care and patient health through health IT, focusing on small practices.
This interview was edited for length and readability.
HCA CEO Richard Bracken
- A good article, possibly the best McKinsey CEO interview yet – practically coherent with not a single three letter acronym
- On leadership skills:
- The attitude of the organization toward change is established by the tone set at the top. For me, that means a continued statement, restatement, communication, and validation of the company’s mission and values, which includes reinforcing its culture. This is the CEO’s first and most important job and a clear requirement of leadership. As leaders, we must not only determine the appropriate strategic course but also define how we, as individuals and as an organization, will conduct ourselves.
- Second, and most obvious, leaders must ensure the development and execution of a clear, well-communicated, and appropriately measured operating plan.
- Third, effective leaders ensure that the right team, with the right values, is in place to execute the plan and can pivot appropriately when factors change.
- Fourth, effective leaders show an intellectual flexibility that recognizes there are different ways to achieve goals and objectives within different environments. To me, it is important that environmental and market changes do not modify the company’s, or the executive’s, basic values.
- Advice to aspiring leaders:
- And finally, I think a good leader is a problem solver. How an organization deals with problems, failures, and missed opportunities clearly defines an important aspect of its culture.
- First, make sure you’re working in an organization where there is a good fit between your core values and the organization’s values—it will be difficult to be engaged and productive if there is a misalignment.
- Second, stay focused on delivering in your current position; many otherwise highly capable people are too quick to be thinking about the next promotion. No one likes a team member who is focused on the next opportunity.
- Also, don’t be intimidated by the tough assignments, the ones others may not want. These are often the places where you can grow and prove yourself.
- And finally, never forget that taking calculated risks is the mark of a good leader. And once you commit, it’s important never to go at it halfway.
PDF: Leading in the 21st century An interview with HCA CEO Richard Bracken
Leading in the 21st century: An interview with HCA CEO Richard Bracken
The chairman and chief executive officer of one of the world’s largest operators of health-care facilities discusses leadership in a time of significant industry change.
November 2013
With 165 hospitals, 113 freestanding surgery centers, and more than 200,000 employees in the United Kingdom and the United States, Nashville-based Hospital Corporation of America (HCA) is one of the world’s largest operators of health-care facilities. Chairman and CEO Richard M. Bracken is steering his publicly traded company through the significant changes now transforming the health-care industry—and doing so amid considerable uncertainty. For Bracken, the leadership challenge comes down to getting the balance right between performing in the short term and taking the necessary steps to position his company to cope successfully under multiple possible scenarios in the future.
“The nature of our business is such that we must produce a highly efficient and quality service with predictable clinical outcomes, 24 hours a day, seven days per week,” Bracken says. “By necessity, this creates a daily focus that is ever-present throughout the organization. However, we also must be cognizant of forces that are fundamentally changing the health-care delivery system in America—changes that will transform our organization in the years to come. How we strike the right balance between short- and long-term performance metrics and between traditional and evolving strategic approaches consumes much of our time.”
In weighing these trade-offs, Bracken draws from 32 years of experience at HCA, which, he feels, has helped to define his approach to leadership and helps him and his top team get these critical recalibrations right. He spoke with McKinsey’s Rik Kirkland, Ramesh Srinivasan, and Rick Schlesinger about leadership, the changing nature of health care in the United States, and how HCA is finding innovative ways to deliver better patient care at a lower cost.
McKinsey: The context seems quite different today than, say, 20 years ago. The pace of change has accelerated, the global economy is increasingly volatile, and there is more disruption across industries. Does today’s environment require greater leadership skills?
Richard Bracken: Although it is a volatile time and the pace of change does seem quicker now, I am hesitant to say that any one operating environment is a tougher test of leadership than another. Of course, business cycles vary, drivers of growth differ over time, and environmental and market-share disruptors are forever present. Importantly, it’s the degree to which these scenarios play out at any given time that defines the leadership skill set required. To me, the important key is to adjust your style and approach to what is required for the situation. Unfortunately, one set of attributes rarely proves to be adequate over a career.
That said, I do think today’s health-care industry presents some particularly unique challenges. At HCA, our starting point for considering any strategic change first must pass a fundamental test: how might such a change affect our ability to provide quality care and service? How well a strategy supports this very first standard significantly influences any action we might take.
McKinsey: Can you elaborate on the leadership skills it takes to meet that challenge?
Richard Bracken: I’m not fond of trying to sum up something as nuanced as leadership skills, but if I had to say what are some of the fundamental attributes of leadership that matter to me, the following would be high on my list.
First, the attitude of the organization toward change is established by the tone set at the top. For me, that means a continued statement, restatement, communication, and validation of the company’s mission and values, which includes reinforcing its culture. This is the CEO’s first and most important job and a clear requirement of leadership. As leaders, we must not only determine the appropriate strategic course but also define how we, as individuals and as an organization, will conduct ourselves. Second, and most obvious, leaders must ensure the development and execution of a clear, well-communicated, and appropriately measured operating plan. Third, effective leaders ensure that the right team, with the right values, is in place to execute the plan and can pivot appropriately when factors change. Fourth, effective leaders show an intellectual flexibility that recognizes there are different ways to achieve goals and objectives within different environments. To me, it is important that environmental and market changes do not modify the company’s, or the executive’s, basic values. And finally, I think a good leader is a problem solver. How an organization deals with problems, failures, and missed opportunities clearly defines an important aspect of its culture.
McKinsey: Given the shifting external environment in health care, how is HCA responding?
Richard Bracken: With regard to current environmental changes in the industry, we believe we are well-positioned to adapt and excel through reliance on certain core strategies—leveraging our size and scale to drive cost efficiencies, using our multimarket positions to test new and innovative ideas, using our collective “operating intellect” to drive best clinical and management practices across the enterprise, and balancing our capital deployment to respond to specific market opportunities. Also, because of the unique size and diversity of our market portfolio, a transitory softness in one geographic market or service area is offset by strength in another. This feature allows us to mitigate market risk and at the same time test new strategies.
Our scale also offers us the flexibility to deploy technology solutions to improve care. One recent example of this is our newly developed clinical-data warehouse, which will provide the basis for a resource that can inform and improve care, support the efficiency of operations, and, we believe, generate growth and new revenue streams.
We have been in development and are in the early stages of harnessing this “big data” resource, which will use our 20 million patient encounters a year to help improve outcomes and support predictive modeling and personalized medicine. While initially the product of all electronic health records, the clinical-data warehouse ultimately is expected to include patient-generated data, as well as data streams from diagnostic devices.
McKinsey: What other big changes may be out there?
Richard Bracken: Our research tells us the consumer is taking a growing and more meaningful interest in the details of his or her care, and that trend is expected to intensify. Generally, the more information we can put at an individual’s disposal—such as condition, treatment, history, cost, options and prognosis—the more effective the patient relationship could be.
For example, we are in the early stages of developing a patient portal, which has the potential to change how patients might participate in their care plans. The portal could centralize an individual’s health-care history, enable the provider to offer suggestions for the personalized care of each patient, and allow for improved communication among the entire care team. So, in the case of an individual who undergoes a knee replacement, for instance, the portal could allow participants to share data and to communicate in a more integrated fashion with regard to aspects of care—pain management, wound care, physical therapy, et cetera. The patient could be an active participant in discussions, which would allow the consumer to take a more dynamic role in his or her advancement. This development could be especially meaningful for patients with ongoing chronic conditions such as diabetes, cancer, or heart disease.
McKinsey: HCA is a complex organization with a large number of individual operating units and a small corporate center. How do you manage that relationship?
Richard Bracken: To begin with, we don’t take the position that corporate leadership in Nashville has all the answers. While certain regulatory standards or other industry requirements dictate a more centralized approach to ensure consistent compliance, we view the collective intellect of our enterprise as one of our most important assets. Our operations people are an integral part of our strategic planning and development. We field-test strategic initiatives so the people who are closest to execution can help shape solutions. By systematically gathering their input—and relying on their collective experience—we build a comprehensive viewpoint. For example, the idea of standardizing the emergency room–treatment process and reducing wait times came from corporate leadership, but the approach, process, and implementation were developed by our clinical and operations personnel. We have had great success in reducing wait times, as well as improving efficiency and the consumer experience.
McKinsey: Given HCA’s scale, how do you as leader stay connected?
Richard Bracken: This is a real issue, and it’s common for CEOs to feel surrounded by people who filter negative information. To get unfiltered information, I’ve found that you must spend significant and quality time in the operations environment. I have an advantage that others may lack. Having been with this company for over 30 years, I know a lot of people across the organization. I get important intelligence directly from them. I can assure you I get very candid input. It is these relationships that can drive a better understanding of a new initiative or identify flaws early in the process.
McKinsey: Any advice for aspiring leaders?
Richard Bracken: First, make sure you’re working in an organization where there is a good fit between your core values and the organization’s values—it will be difficult to be engaged and productive if there is a misalignment. Second, stay focused on delivering in your current position; many otherwise highly capable people are too quick to be thinking about the next promotion. No one likes a team member who is focused on the next opportunity. Also, don’t be intimidated by the tough assignments, the ones others may not want. These are often the places where you can grow and prove yourself. And finally, never forget that taking calculated risks is the mark of a good leader. And once you commit, it’s important never to go at it halfway.
Step Jockey – real world calorie indicators
- terrific behavioural intervention
- funded by UK Dept of Health
http://www.springwise.com/london-begins-labeling-physical-world-calorie-loss-indicators/
London begins labeling the physical world with calorie loss indicators
Funded by the UK Department of Health, the startup believes that walking up and down stairs, rather than taking an elevator or escalator, can improve cardiovascular fitness and even help people lose weight. StepJockey’s research suggests that stair climbing burns more calories per minute than jogging and even walking down them is more healthy.
The team is currently crowdsourcing data about the country’s stairs, encouraging fans to type in the location of the office building or public staircase they want to measure and count how many steps there are. The site — or free iPhone app for smartphone users — then calculates how many calories are burned by using them. Users can then print off or order posters to hang next to the stairs, giving passersby that extra bit of encouragement to avoid the easy way up. Each poster features a QR code and NFC tag, enabling those with smartphones to log, track and share their calorie burning with friends.
According to StepJockey, the signs were developed using the principles of behavioral science, and tests proved that the nudge to take the stairs improved usage by up to 29 percent in some cases. Are there other aspects of the real world that can be improved with the addition of similar labels, offering useful data and digital interaction?
Website: www.stepjockey.com
Contact: www.stepjockey.com/contact-us
Spotted by Murray Orange, written by Springwise
Gamification in health…
- people are more open to learning from a game than a powerpoint or clinician
- fun, competition, and social networks all have positive affects on health and fitness behavior
- “Practitioners still haven’t internalized the idea that we need to help people do the right thing. Not just by giving them the opportunity, but making them want to do it.”
- “Designing engagement into social games is largely about manipulating dopamine response. Gamifying health allows us to hack into our natural feedback loops by engineering ways for us to get more dopamine for demonstrating good behavior.”
Source: http://www.medcrunch.net/whats-fun/ (via RWJF)
Gaming for Patient Treatment – What’s Fun Got to Do With It?
by SUSAN E. WILLIAMS on Nov 6, 2013 • 8:48 pm
“People rarely succeed unless they have fun in what they are doing.” -Dale Carnegie
The Theory of Fun is an organization devoted to social experiments in fun. In one experiment, they turned a staircase next to an escalator into a piano to see whether people would still opt for the less physically challenging escalator. Not only did people choose for the fun piano staircase; they also went up and down the stairs multiple times (see the results here.) Playfulness has increasingly become incorporated into patient engagement and adherence. Additionally, creative tactics like video games that use fun, competition, and your social networks have shown positive affects on health and fitness behavior.
Paul Tarini, team leader for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation’s Pioneer Portfolio, reported in 2010 that the collision of games and healthcare was inevitable. Featured that year at the Games for Health conference in Boston, MA, were dancing games for patients with Parkinson’s disease, or alternatives-to-smoking games on iPhones. Since, we’ve seen an unveiling of companies that develop games benefitting all sorts of conditions from anxiety and depression (SinaSprite byLitesprite) to games for kids with cancer (Re-Mission2 by Hopelab). The results have been significant and have illustrated how patients feel more inclined to accept and learn from a game about their condition than from, say, a PowerPoint or clinician. In Re-Mission2, results showed how players adhered to their treatment longer and more consistently after interacting with the game. Even more impressive, players had higher levels of chemotherapy in their body and so were literally responding to treatment better.
Michael Fergusson, founder and CEO of Ayogo Games, a social gaming production company based in Vancouver, believes games are the key to patient engagement and adherence. Practitioners, Fergusson says, “ still haven’t internalized the idea that we need to help people do the right thing. Not just by giving them the opportunity, but making them want to do it.”
Prescribed Fun: The Trick (or Science) of Adherence and Engagement
The World Health Organization (click for report) has said that people around the world will benefit more from adherence than from new therapy. Esther Dyson, an active investor in the digital health movement, has said, “It’s colossal stupidity that people aren’t healthier, because we know how to do it.” Yet, we don’t. Our own inability to do what we know we need to is the cause of many health care problems.
Perhaps social games can help. Social games are digital games played with your online social communities (like Facebook and Twitter). According to Ayogo Games: “Designing engagement into social games is largely about manipulating dopamine response. Gamifying health allows us to hack into our natural feedback loops by engineering ways for us to get more dopamine for demonstrating good behavior.”
A recent NPR article, “How Video Games Are Getting Inside Your Head – And Your Wallet”discusses how video game architects actively track children’s engagement with the game they’re playing. Inherent in any game design is research, tests, and analysis, all of which are imperative to making the game more fun, more engaging, and more likely to hold the player’s attention longer, and in some cases long enough to buy something.
The science of the brain and human behavior are integral to the success of a game. Many, especially parents trying desperately to get their kids outdoors, interacting with “real” things and “real” people, have more damning language about these studies than applauding. Indeed, most, when attributing the term “brain manipulation” to something, don’t have many nice things to say. Yet, looking at all this through a health care lens, if doing the same types of testing, tweaking and manipulation leads to positive and permanent change in health and fitness of an individual, it can’t be that bad, right?
Michael Fergusson believes this, and has created successful games where players’ health and behavior improve because of it. One of Ayogo’s first health care games, Healthseeker, was for people living with diabetes, and the first health care game on Facebook. They had over 15,000 players. There were parts that were extremely successful, but other elements that weren’t. They reviewed the data and looked at what worked and what didn’t to see what design elements of the game brought players success in their health goals. What they found was players who consistently received incoming messages of encouragement from their online social networks had significantly greater chances of success. Putting friends and family into their application, Ayogo discovered, makes the game more meaningful. As a result, this design element has been brought forward into other game designs.
Team Fun
“Man is most nearly himself when he achieves the seriousness of a child at play.” -Heraclitus
Outside of the digital space, Little Bit Therapeutic Riding Center provides equine facilitated therapy to children and adults with neurological, pyshological, and physiological disabilities. For the riders, working with horses provides an overwhelming sense of joy, and the therapy no longer becomes treatment-like. Instead, it’s fun and unpredictable. More, a rider’s experience of success is linked to the team supporting her efforts – her volunteers, her horse, and her instructor. Play, joy, laughter, excitement – they all have healing powers for our minds, bodies, and spirits – and the value of your community in sustaining all that cannot be underestimated, whatever the method.
“The experience of interacting with your own health can be dramatically affected,” says Fergusson. Because of this you want the design of the experience to engage as many people as possible so that embedded in the design, is an evolving conversation where people can learn together and improve the quality of life together. To this, Fergusson asks an interesting question: “There’s a question about who’s behavior you’re really trying to affect in social gaming – is it the person’s behavior or the community of that person?” Perhaps it’s both that need to change in order for engagement and adherence to really stick.