http://www.apartmenttherapy.com/sarah-brians-house-tour-186881#gallery/42683/17
Related topics: Fruit, vegetable, nut ingredients, Meat, fish and savory ingredients, Suppliers, Manufacturers
A longtime school foodservice supplier of meat enhancer is looking to get its flavorless, tart cherry-based blend—which it claims can increase product yield, extend shelf life, reduce fat content, lower cost and decrease the carcinogenic effect of cooking—into the meat processing market and ultimately on supermarket shelves.
“For the last 18 years, BLENDit has been in school foodservice in 14 states,” said David Mathia, president of Pleva International, which produces BLENDit, told FoodNavigator-USA. “I joined the company a year and a half ago to help change the strategy to selling ingredients to meat processors in the US. We’ve spent the last 12 months figuring out who to talk to and have been negotiating with several large retail providers—big box and grocery, as well as the processors themselves. Our strategy is to go after both.”
Fat reduction without losing juiciness
Pleva International’s proprietary BLENDit ingredient incorporates fully ripe IQF tart cherries, oat fiber for binding and spices, though the firm declined to specify the exact ratio of BLENDit to meat. It appears on ingredient labels as “cherries”, “oat fiber” and “spices”.
“Ingredient lists run from 10% to 26% of the cherry itself—and that’s the biggest factor—depending on the proprietary formula desire by the client,” Mathia said. “Unlike a powder or concentrate that’s 1 to 1.5% yield, whatever we add gives bulk to the product.”
Materials from the company claim that BLENDit added to beef that is 85% lean will take the beef to 86 ¾% lean.
“Typically, having a product that’s healthy, juicy and tastes good usually couldn’t be said in the same sentence,”said Pleva CEO Cindy Pleva-Weber. “A low-fat burger tended to be drier or had ingredients in there that might not have been pleasing to public and the palate. On the other hand, cherries added to a lean ground meat give the consumer the better tasting, juiciness of a higher fat burger, but you don’t get that higher fat content,” she claimed.
Adding cherries to the ground meat mixture is also less expensive than using protein alone, which Pleva-Weber claims can result in “notable” cost savings to manufacturers over time.
This isn’t the first time fruit has been incorporated into burgers for a reduced fat option. A few years ago, the trend hit big in the higher-end dining segment, with Donald Trump’s Sixteen hotel restaurant in Chicago, the Mar-A-Lago Club in Palm Beach, FL, and The Cherry Hut in Beulah, MI, incorporating blueberries, cherries, cranberries and apple chunks into their burgers for added juiciness and health benefits that even caught Oprah’s attention in a 2009 show.
But unlike those incorporations, BLENDit’s cherries aren’t meant to be seen or tasted.
“It’s a beautiful thing that one ingredient, the tart cherry, can solve a lot of issues and answer a lot of problems for a vast array of people. Plus, it doesn’t impart a flavor, so you don’t have that issue,” Pleva-Weber said.“We’ve incorporated the cherries into chicken, turkey, pork, bison, venison, even salami with good results. With the ground white meat chicken you’d think you would see the cherries, but you do not.”
If clients do want a flavor profile introduced, “we have several—probably 70 or more that they can choose from,”Mathia added.
Growing number of studies on tart cherry benefits
Recently published research suggests that tart cherries can support healthy imflammatory response, slow lipid peroxidation and increase antioxidant capacity in the blood, as well as boost exercise recovery and improve sleep quality and duration .
Pleva also points to an almost 20-year-old study published in the Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry by Michigan State University researchers, which purported that the antioxidant properties of tart cherries can keep pre-cooked meat from having a “warmed-over” flavor—characteristic of fast-onset rancidity in cooked, refrigerated meat—when reheated, as well as extend shelf life in fresh proteins.
“Oxidation was significantly influenced by the addition of tissue from two varieties of tart cherries, Montmorency and Balaton,” the authors wrote. “Thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances values for raw and cooked ground beef patties containing cherry tissue were significantly smaller than those for the control beef patties. Cholesterol oxidation was also influenced by the presence of cherry tissue. After 4 days of refrigerated storage, cholesterol oxides represented 5.2% of the total cholesterol content of cooked control beef patties and 2.0 and 1.7% of the total cholesterol in patties containing Montmorency and Balaton cherry tissue, respectively. The formation of mutagenic/carcinogenic HAAs (heterocyclic aromatic amines) during frying of the patties was inhibited by components in the cherry tissue.
“The results clearly demonstrate that cherry tissue effectively inhibits the development of oxidation and rancidity in both raw and cooked ground beef patties during storage. The antioxidant mechanism of cherry tissue is not completely understood, but recent studies indicate that anthocyanin components have significant antioxidant activity.”
Mathia noted that research on the health benefits of tart cherries is ongoing, more recently at Central Michigan University, adding that BLENDit may offer a “clean label, cost saving” solution for meat processors and ultimately the end consumer.
“The thing to remember is, nature provided us this solution without taking away whatever flavor profile client is trying to achieve, that is just going to make it juicier and healthier with the added benefit of antioxidants,” he claimed.
Eating nuts daily tied to lower overall death rate: Harvard study
Related topics: Fruit, vegetable, nut ingredients, Suppliers, R&D, Health & Wellness, Markets, Manufacturers
People who ate a daily handful of nuts were 20% less likely to die from any cause over a 30-year period than those who didn’t, according to the largest study of its kind by scientists from the Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Bringham & Women’s Hospital and the Harvard School of Public Health.
The report, published in the New England Journal of Medicine last week, also showed that those who ate nuts daily also weighed less.
“I think the results are very exciting,” said Peter Pribis, assistant professor of nutrition and dietetics at the University of New Mexico, applauding the “extensive adjustments” made by the researchers during the study in order to best represent a long-term diet and minimize individual variations.
“The message is getting slowly through that nuts are very healthy and something we should eat in small amounts every day. And it’s very easy to do. We talk about exercise, and it can be hard for a lot of people to commit to doing it. But eating nuts takes a few seconds. And look at the huge benefits this group of food can do for us health wise.”
For the study, the researchers analyzed nut consumption with total and cause-specific mortality among 76,464 women in the Nurses’ Health Study and 42,498 men in the Health Professionals Follow-up Study. Consumption of a handful of nuts—which included both groundnuts such as peanuts and tree nuts including almonds, Brazil nuts, cashews, hazelnuts, macadamias, pecans, pine nuts, pistachios and walnuts—was inversely associated with total mortality in both men and women, independent of other predictors for death.
In this case, a “handful” translated to 1 ounce or three tablespoons, seven or more times per week. This shouldn’t be hard to achieve, according to the NPD Group, which recently found that 77% of U.S. households have nuts or seeds on-hand and 19% of individuals eat nuts at least once in a two-week period.
In addition, the study found that there were significant inverse associations for deaths due to cancer (11% reduction), heart disease (29% reduction) and respiratory disease. And those who regularly ate nuts also tended to have a healthy lifestyle, such as smoking less and exercising more.
Nuts contain an optimal lipid profile, but portion size is important
“One truth is that all nuts contain a very optimal lipid profile,” Dr. Pribis noted. “They have done careful studies to examine the weight issue. Looking at the Nurse’s Health Study, when we age, we tend to gain weight. Those people who ate nuts tended to gain less.”
Indeed, Jenny Heap, MS, RD, manager of global health and nutrition communications at the Almond Board of California, said that the study “adds to the strong body of evidence showing that eating tree nuts regularly is part of a healthy lifestyle.” She also pointed to recent research published in the European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, which showed that participants eating 1.5 ounces of dry-roasted, lightly salted almonds every day experienced reduced hunger and improved dietary vitamin E and monounsaturated fat intake without increasing body weight.
But portion size is key, said Dr. Pribis. “Nuts are very energy dense, so they can curb hunger. But also in realizing that they’re so energy dense, if you exceed two servings per day, then you might start to gain weight. It’s about balance.”
This could also have implications as food manufacturers may look to incorporate more nuts into formulations on the heels of such strong positive results.
“It definitely has implications for food manufacturers,” Dr. Pribis noted. “I am afraid we’ll see some of them take junk food and add nuts to it and try to sell it like it’s ‘healthier’. On the other hand, maybe we’ll see more items like cereal with nuts incorporated. But again, consumers would need to eat less of it to get the benefits”—a variable that could prove difficult for manufacturers to control.
Source: New England Journal of Medicine
“Association of Nut Consumption with Total and Cause-Specific Mortality”
DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa1307352
Authors: Ying Bao, M.D., Sc.D., Jiali Han, Ph.D., Frank B. Hu, M.D., Ph.D., Edward L. Giovannucci, M.D., Sc.D., Meir J. Stampfer, M.D., Dr.P.H., Walter C. Willett, M.D., Dr.P.H., and Charles S. Fuchs, M.D., M.P.H.
20% tax on sugar sweetened beverages (2014-2023) could
Related topics: Policy, Food safety, Beverages
India could prevent an estimated 400,000 people from contracting diabetes over the next 10 years if the government were to impose a 20% tax on sugar-sweetened beverages (SSB), a new study has suggested.
According to a study published this week in PLOS Medicine by researchers at the Public Health Foundation of India, New Delhi, along with academic institutions in the US and the UK, it is estimated that imposing such a tax across India could avert 11.2m cases of overweight and obesity, and 400,000 cases of type 2 diabetes between 2014 and 2023, based on the current rate of increases in SSB sales.
Statistical analysis
The researchers analysed soft drink consumption from over 100,000 households between 2009 and 2010, studying how they responded to price changes in the past, then using that information to predict how a tax on soft drinks would influence consumption trends.
The findings come at a time when Indian health policymakers have been arguing that a combination of education and disincentives should be used to curb the consumption of soft drinks.
If SSB sales were to increase more steeply than the current rate, as predicted by drinks industry marketing models, the researchers estimate that the tax would avert 15.8m cases of overweight and obesity, and 600,000 cases of diabetes.
“Sustained SSB taxation at a high tax rate could mitigate rising obesity and type 2 diabetes in India among both urban and rural subpopulations,” the researchers wrote.
“Future research should replicate the findings observed here in other rapidly developing middle-income countries where SSB consumption is increasing at a rapid rate.”
The researchers combined data on how price changes affect the demand for SSBs with historical data on SSB sales trends, BMIs, and new cases of diabetes to estimate the effect that a 20% SSB tax would have on energy consumption, the prevalence of overweight and obesity, and the number of new cases of diabetes among Indian subpopulations.
Surprising results
The researchers were surprised to observe that the largest relative effect of the SSB tax was likely to be among young men in rural areas.
“Given current consumption and BMI distributions, our results suggest the largest relative effect would be expected among young rural men, refuting our a priori hypothesis that urban populations would be isolated beneficiaries of SSB taxation“, they wrote.
They also calculated that the gains from the tax could be even bigger if sales of sweetened beverages in India grow in the coming years not at a linear 13%, as has been the case since 1998, but more steeply as the drinks industry predicts will be the case.
increase fibre content (as a bulking agent) instead of reducing portion size – they have half the calories, but are more expensive and less stable.
New word – rheology: the study of the flow of matter, primarily in the liquid state.
Sugar under siege: Reformulation can win the battle, says Barry Callebaut
Related topics: Carbohydrates and fibers (sugar, starches), Chocolate and confectionery ingredients, Sweeteners (intense, bulk, polyols), Suppliers, R&D, The obesity problem, Health & Wellness, Confectionery
Replacing sugar with fibers in chocolate could be more effective in reducing global sugar consumption than cutting portion sizes, but will come at a cost, according to Barry Callebaut.
Campaign group Action on Sugar was established today with the aim of pressuring manufacturers to reduce sugar in products by 30% over the next four years. Its chairman told ConfectioneryNews that the organization favored cutting sugar by reducing portion sizes rather than substitution.
Portion control: Foolproof plan to cut calories?
Marijke De Brouwer, innovation manager at Barry Callebaut, said that global salt reduction came through reformulation, so why couldn’t sugar?
“Reducing the portion size is rather easy because it’s only playing with the weight, but with portion size you do not reduce the sugar percentage.”
Fibers for positive health impact
She argued that reformulation would have a greater impact and suggested replacing up to 30% of sugar in chocolate with fibers to perform a bulking function.
“It has a positive health impact. Fibers have some functional benefits versus sugar.”
A fiber replacement would help increase global fiber consumption and would also limit calories in a product since sugar is 4 kcal per gram and fibers 2 kcal per gram.
The cost
Asked why the practice of replacing sugar with fibers had not yet been widely adopted by the chocolate industry, De Brouwer said: “It’s because of the price impact.”
Barry Callebaut acknowledged that fibers were more expensive but would not say by how much.
Fibers may also impact processability depending on the application, potentially adding an extra cost to ensure products have the same rheology, taste and texture.
“If you want to guarantee it has 30% less sugar, you need to avoid contamination,” added De Brouwer.
She said that brands could feasibly combine reformulation with portion size reduction to cut sugar.
Health implications
Action on Sugar contends that added sugar in food and drinks is an unnecessary source of calories in the diet that is responsible for rising global obesity. It adds that sugar is linked to other damaging health effects such as type II diabetes.
The World Health Organization (WHO) recommends that no more than 10% of calories in a person’s diet should come from added sugars for optimal health, but The Sunday Times claims to be in possession of a leaked WHO draft document that says the organization is considering cutting its recommendation to 5% in light of fresh scientific research linking sugar to obesity, heart disease and tooth decay.
What’s the reference?
Action on Sugar hopes manufacturers will reduce sugar by 30% in products over the next four years compared to current levels of sugar in that product.
For example, if Mars opted only for portion control, a 51 g Mars bar would become 42 g.
yoahhhh mumma – how many dimensions can you fit on a graph:
Time has its “Person of the Year.” Amazon has its books of the year. Pretty Much Amazing has its mixtapes of the year. Buzzfeed has its insane-stories-from-Florida of the year. And Wonkblog, of course, has its graphs of the year. For 2013, we asked some of the year’s most interesting, important and influential thinkers to name their favorite graph of the year — and why they chose it. Here’s Bill Gates’s.
Infographic by Thomas Porostocky for WIRED.
“I love this graph because it shows that while the number of people dying from communicable diseases is still far too high, those numbers continue to come down. In fact, fewer kids are dying, more kids are going to school and more diseases are on their way to being eliminated. But there remains much to do to cut down the deaths in that yellow block even more dramatically. We have the solutions. But we need to keep the up support where they’re being deployed, and pressure to get them into places where they’re desperately needed.”
– Bill Gates is Co-Chair of the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/wonkblog/wp/2013/12/27/bill-gatess-graph-of-the-year/
http://www.ted.com/talks/sandra_aamodt_why_dieting_doesn_t_usually_work.html
I don’t really align with the message that dieting is futile, but I did like the section on mindful eating:
If diets worked, we’d all be thin already.
And so it begins… the long march to effect entirely legitimate change.
With a strong and independent food regulator, the UK is the western democracy best placed to see this through. All strength to their arm – it’s going to be a doozy!
From Marion Nestle: http://www.foodpolitics.com/2014/01/action-on-sugar-to-the-food-industry-reduce-sugar-now/
A group of public health experts based mainly in Britain have announced a new anti-sugar campaign.
Called Action on Sugar, it is modeled on Great Britain’s campaign to get the food industry to gradually reduce salt in processed foods—voluntarily. That campaign is considered to have led to a reduction of 25% to 40%.
Action on Sugar’s objective: Reduce sugar in packaged foods by 20% to 30% over the next 3 to 5 years.
Action on Sugar is a group of specialists concerned with sugar and its effects on health. It is successfully working to reach a consensus with the food industry and Government over the harmful effects of a high sugar diet, and bring about a reduction in the amount of sugar in processed foods. Action on Sugar is supported by 18 expert advisors.
As one of the experts put it, “Everywhere, sugary drinks and junk foods are now pressed on unsuspecting parents and children by a cynical industry focused on profit not health”—just like the tobacco industry behaves.
You have to love the British press:
Source: http://www.actiononsugar.org/
• To reach a consensus with the food manufacturers and suppliers that there is strong evidence that refined added sugar is a major cause of obesity and has other adverse health effects.
• To persuade the food processors and suppliers to universally and gradually reduce the added sugar content of processed foods.
• To ensure clear and comprehensive nutritional labelling of added sugar content of all processed foods and beverages, using the recommended traffic light system.
• To educate the public in becoming more sugar aware in terms of understanding the impact of added sugar on their health, checking labels when shopping and avoiding products with high levels of added sugar.
• To ensure that children are highlighted as a particularly vulnerable group whose health is more at risk from high added sugar intakes.
• To ensure the body of scientific evidence about the dangers of excessive refined added sugar consumption becomes translated into policy by the Government and relevant professional organisations.
• To conduct a Parliamentary campaign to ensure the Government and Department of Health take action, and that, if the food industry do not comply with the sugar targets, they will enact legislation or impose a added sugar tax.
• To work with other organisations and stakeholders in order to maximise the message about what is a healthy diet, ensuring this includes reducing the current national high added sugar intake.
• To work with experts in individual countries, the World Health Organisation (WHO) and individual ministries of health and other relevant bodies.